Primary Links:

Midwest NanoSafety Worskhop May 2007

NanoCafé Events

Add to

or
xml ical html

Browse archives

« July 2008  
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
    1 2 4 5
6 8 12
13 17 18
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Have a question to ask? Want to get involved?

Feel free to contact us

CCoN's comments to the government

21 November 2007

The EPA's nanotechnology applications and implications research - NanoWerk, USA
Politicians, activist groups, and individuals in the general public have questioned the ability of federal agencies to adequately oversee the development of nanotechnology. In particular, the lack of human and environmental health and safety data so far has led to an absence of regulations on engineered nanoparticles and materials containing these particles. Some industry groups, especially the cosmetics industry, have actually used the lack of such data to argue that their products are safe and have aggressively lobbied against any regulations. The EPA is funding a number of research projects that address these data gaps, resulting in a significant amount of new data. The authors point out the need for toxicity studies concerning the risks from nanomaterials released from consumer products during their entire lifecycle.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
More information about formatting options

Nanotechnology Latest News

The articles presented here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Citizens' Coalition on Nanotechnology. Coming from varied sources with different points of view, they make a range of perspectives available, so people can see the diversity of debates currently going on. Sharing different perspectives is essential to healthy citizen deliberation and democracy. You are encouraged to question and evaluate matters further by yourself with the info provided here and elsewhere.